That's a lot of effort combing through past posts just to prove a weak point desertman.
You have this fun habit of stating that you won't be participating in certain conversations again. I'm not going to tell you what to do with your online time but wouldn't a more productive approach to be to simply not enter the conversation to begin with? It's a lot like saying nyah nyah I get the last say and you can't do anything about it.
did you not read the post where i admitted a conversation occurred?
or that you didn't express the points of view I've stated you expressed is just a lie.
End of story.
You can deny it if you choose to, after the fact. But, that is just a testament to your character.
You would be better served to say, "Yeah, I said that at the time but now I just don't care.".
But pretending you didn't say it, and then also going out of your way to point out that even if you did say it that you really don't care just says something about you as a person, and not the issue at hand at all.
Either way. That's all I have to say about it.
I won't even visit this thread again.
The conversation is over.
i have multiple posts that present attitudes counterintuitive to what you say I said. your statements that I confirmed things "beyond a reasonable doubt" make no sense whatsoever. again, i would never confirm anything "beyond a reasonable doubt" that i didn't participate or have a hand in. it's clear that you have major misconceptions about what happened in that five minute shoutbox exchange. all evidence points to otherwise of what you said. and surprise surprise, you have no evidence or anything to back up the allegations you're trying to make.
but instead of accepting that you had the wrong ideas or misremembered something, you're accusing me of lying and trying to make an attack on my character while going "la la la i won't read any response" and running away.
i guess i made the mistake of once again assuming that another Armer was a grown adult that could be talked to man to man and not a child that would make shit up and then run away when they got called on their bullshit.
Post by ppurg pallbearer on Apr 24, 2016 18:03:21 GMT -5
I think everyone's willing to accept that desertman is more of an expert on what jcarter meant in his posts than jcarter is. That is, everyone who has their biases to confirm by assuming so.
The premise is so flawed. It's as if Armageddon's secure information is so secure, there's only ever been one leak that was over a decade ago. I'll shoot a hole through your false premise, desertman; there's information in the leak which was recorded after said sleepless' roommate shenanigans, what with the name-shaming. It's a good thing you've decided to plug your ears and turn tail, because there's no real leg for you to stand on by continuing to insist that this leak and that leak are the same.
ignoring the weird obsession with control that desertman has, what with telling me how and when the conversation where he calls me a liar ends, everything about it is preposterous.
there's a crazy level of narcissism in there. i have no relationship with desertman. how i felt about the situation has been posted multiple times in plain sight on the board. i'm not sure why he believes i would sit down and give him some sort of guarantee or something on what happened. or that i would somehow tell him something different than what i've posted multiple times. or that he would be access to information which no one else has, such as some sort of jcarter guarantee on the level of information. then that he wants to sit here and tell me i am wrong and that he remembers it perfectly, with nothing to back it up and complete denial in the face of anything that would disagree with him.
but hey i'm sure he's an unbiased person considering he posted how much he disagrees with this and tried calling me out on a board he knows i can't post on to call him a liar. yep, let's just take his word on this one.
Last Edit: Apr 24, 2016 18:36:37 GMT -5 by jcarter
Post by ppurg pallbearer on Apr 24, 2016 20:52:48 GMT -5
Now that everyone who's anyone has virtue-signalled on the thread in the GDB, it has been locked and the discussion may continue here unfettered and in earnest. Not that there's much to discuss; desertman has baited a trap for jcarter by putting words in his mouth, but unfortunately failed to notice that his failed narrative is impossible short of a time machine. Accepting that sleepless' slander is true, that information was leaked over a decade ago.
The wikileak has data much more recent than that, which means it's impossible for the two to be the same -- and likely to be completely unrelated; so much to desertman's chagrin that he had to pack up and leave before he could be held to defend his illogical stance. I think he picked the perfect time to shut up, because now there's no expectation that he will yet again lie and misrepresent what's been said on this board in an appeal to the approval of... whom? The staff. Hope you get your last karma, dman -- you've earned it this time!
And so this whole fabrication of SQL injections and hacking and specifically database breaching, as Nessalin cried about, can have yet another nail hammered through its coffin.
Dman, I am dissappointed in you. I'm not going to take a wild stab trying to understand your motive, but I can choose not to approve of your words. I thought you were better than that. You don't choose where a conversation ends, and your input is not so valuable that anyone needs to understand your position. Either clarify your statement thoughtfully, or go post some more ass smooches on that other board roughly half of us are banned from.
"grumble is actually a psychotic 40+ something weirdo who lives off the government doll and does nothing but play armageddon all day every day. he has no aspirations, he has no real meaning in his life. only armageddon, getting drunk, and having bizarre pseudo-relationships with the people who play with his characters, of which there is no line between reality and fiction. he exclusively plays elves. i cant make this stuff up." -topkekm8s
Post by ppurg pallbearer on Apr 26, 2016 10:11:40 GMT -5
Keep up, bros. The SQL injection was a misdirection, and became virtually impossible past 2006. Barka lied about that because he didn't want to give up he had a ~source~, but when everyone got on him about it being illegal, he revealed that it was an admin on the inside who had passed the information along to him.
That is, if I'm remembering all the facts right. This game's GDB community has the weird quality of selectively forgetting facts in order to strengthen one's own position.
nile: the only apoc drama be on an arm drama website. lol
May 16, 2020 20:30:49 GMT -5
nile: almost guarantee arm staff are LOVING this. hahaha. long as the game is good fun it's all a bit irrelevant. but the anti-arm crew giving the arm staff some sense of schadenfreude based purely a forum for whining made me lol
May 16, 2020 20:32:52 GMT -5
nile: Also, been playing Arm again on an alt account (omfg their ban was easy to get around...and tbh i have more fun in apoc)
May 16, 2020 20:34:00 GMT -5
vex: Bans are irrelevant, and pointlessly antagonistic. The only game I play, where staff address problems with aggression, bans, and down talk, is Arm. The rest have realized, all that results in, is a bitter player, more inclined towards "revenge" play.
May 19, 2020 19:20:02 GMT -5
vex: Better to incentivize ideal play and behavior, than try and fail to intimidate and leverage empty threats, because nobody is intimidated by an angry elf fetishist on the internet, and there are virtually no threats a player can't circumvent, easily.
May 19, 2020 19:23:36 GMT -5
baobob: Arm turned to condemnation, punishment and vengeful retribution against players pretty hard long, long ago. Never turned back.
May 22, 2020 20:17:04 GMT -5
dotto: is this game still even operating
Jun 6, 2020 10:25:56 GMT -5
Lizzie: i didnt know about apocalypse till today, and im probably not going to ever give it a shot after seeing the last few posts in that thread
Jun 8, 2020 3:04:14 GMT -5