|
|
Subguilds
Oct 24, 2016 14:31:12 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by samosforpresident on Oct 24, 2016 14:31:12 GMT -5
I haven't tried any. Just curious if any of the spells would be fun really. Even if on a basic level. Ya know?
|
|
|
|
Post by sitbackandchillout on Oct 25, 2016 3:51:16 GMT -5
They took away full elementals? Why, update reasons?
|
|
|
|
Post by BitterFlashback on Oct 26, 2016 0:12:29 GMT -5
They took away full elementals? Why, update reasons? That happened months ago. I think the reason given was to streamline magicker players into picking up other games. |
|
|
|
Post by sitbackandchillout on Oct 26, 2016 5:21:01 GMT -5
They took away full elementals? Why, update reasons? That happened months ago. I think the reason given was to streamline magicker players into picking up other games. So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! |
|
shik
staff puppet account
Posts: 17 
|
Post by shik on Oct 26, 2016 6:44:34 GMT -5
Are you daft? lol he's being sarcastic!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2016 8:22:17 GMT -5
That happened months ago. I think the reason given was to streamline magicker players into picking up other games. So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! I dont remember a justification for every part of the magick guild change. Its possible I missed it. Without going back and reading the gdb forum (which you could do instead of asking us to) my recollection is that the staff was uninterested in telling high magick stories with full sorcs, red robes, and full elementals. |
|
seuly
Clueless newb
Posts: 103
|
Post by seuly on Oct 26, 2016 12:21:59 GMT -5
I hate the gimpification of magickers. Now I'll go cry somewhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by fatfinger on Oct 26, 2016 15:45:55 GMT -5
I believe they made some mention of removing full elementalists as preparation for upcoming changes, so we can expect full elementalists back right around never.
|
|
|
|
Post by BitterFlashback on Oct 26, 2016 18:37:44 GMT -5
That happened months ago. I think the reason given was to streamline magicker players into picking up other games. So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! I may have taken some liberties with their given reason. I am pretty sure the word "streamlining" came up but I forget the exact crock of shit to follow it. |
|
|
|
Post by sitbackandchillout on Oct 27, 2016 14:04:36 GMT -5
So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! I may have taken some liberties with their given reason. I am pretty sure the word "streamlining" came up but I forget the exact crock of shit to follow it. Haha, sweet  thanks |
|
|
|
Post by sitbackandchillout on Oct 27, 2016 14:08:16 GMT -5
So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! I dont remember a justification for every part of the magick guild change. Its possible I missed it. Without going back and reading the gdb forum (which you could do instead of asking us to) my recollection is that the staff was uninterested in telling high magick stories with full sorcs, red robes, and full elementals. Thanks for the info  Wasn't meaning anyone should go out of their way and reread posts. Was just asking anyone who read my post if they had memory of reasons given because I completely missed it's occurrence in the game. |
|
|
|
Post by fatfinger on Oct 27, 2016 16:13:57 GMT -5
So they announced, publicly no less, that their objective, by removing content, was to drive active (and experienced) players away from the game?! I dont remember a justification for every part of the magick guild change. Its possible I missed it. Without going back and reading the gdb forum (which you could do instead of asking us to) my recollection is that the staff was uninterested in telling high magick stories with full sorcs, red robes, and full elementals. Because we should all be playing the game for the staffs enjoyment  |
|
jkarr
GDB Superstar
Posts: 2,070
|
Post by jkarr on Oct 27, 2016 16:42:53 GMT -5
full sorcs red robes and mages dont prevent imms from telling their own stories, they just didnt like the idea that players would keep choosing roles that didnt fit into the stories they wanted to tell, and stupidly they want to corral all the players into their limited storyline ideas
of course discussion isnt a part of their process, theyre just going to forcibly take away the roles that dont conform to the stories they want to tell
circling the drain as usual
|
|
thanks
Wasn't meaning anyone should go out of their way and reread posts. Was just asking anyone who read my post if they had memory of reasons given because I completely missed it's occurrence in the game.