|
Post by BitterFlashback on Mar 5, 2014 23:56:09 GMT -5
Hello all. with the recent reminder from dcdc of Nyr's qualiddy staffing, i find myself wondering at the people who show up here defending him. It's entirely possible they've missed out on the true Arm experience. So I am starting this thread with a simple request. I'd like everyone who's had the Nyr Experience to contribute to this thread. With one caveat. Keep the insults to a minimum. i want to highlight how bad a staffer he is. Not to just shit all over him, say "And heres why!", and quote two lines he said. Honestly. As much as i enjoy shitting on him, little would piss him off more than seeing a thread od his own stupidity as a highlight reel. So please just post examples of Nyr being Nyr. the stuff that really made you hate playing Arm. Theres a good variety. Classic Nyr. Purposely Myopic Pedant Nyr. Blatantly Lying Nyr. Blindly Contrarian Nyr. Backpedaling Nyr. And of course, Hyperdefensive For No Reason Nyr. I'm really looking for GDB stuff...but... if you're willing, there's also Request Tool stuff and in-game messages. if youre still playing those last two would out you so be careful. It would also be acceptable to post complaints files against Nyr. But those fall into the "don't out yourself on accident" category. If you're afraid to post here, feel free to Pm me and I'll post on your behalf. all contributors will be kept anonymous. Let me know if you need your typing style concealed. Dont want to risk making an account here? You may not be out of options. my friends may be your friends, so you can always ask someone to relay soemthing to me. Staff members i still talk to? Sure, I;'ll take an entry from the Request Tool/IDB so long as the player ragequit and won't be back. Make sure to go off the email copy or your archives so they don't catch you looking. Edit: To be clear your commentary is quite welcome with your quote. Or your analysis. I just mean dont just go off on him and slap a quote up. take your time and highlight how wrong he was in a way that can't be dismissed out of hand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 0:21:06 GMT -5
I like the fairly new post in RAT, though I'm willing to go digging later, here's one to tide everyone over: " Player actions were the vehicle for the staff desire to shut it down. Yes, staff comes from the playerbase, sure--but staff created CAM, so the playerbase created CAM." (Found here: gdb.armageddon.org/index.php/topic,31255.msg807786.html#msg807786 ) So... staff created CAM because the playerbase created CAM. Well, by that rubric, there's never been a plot that wasn't player driven.
|
|
|
Post by BitterFlashback on Mar 6, 2014 2:00:05 GMT -5
So it started with this thread from Kryos. gdb.armageddon.org/index.php/topic,47083.0.html when he finishes his autobiography, he invokes Hearts, Clubs, Diamonds, Spades: Players Who Suit Muds. Not at all an accurate description of role players. Here's the thing... i'm often wrongly accused of being a pedant. It's becauyse I'm anal-retentive. What's the difference? I still understoodf what the guy was going for and agreed with his message even though I found fault in his illustration.
Guess who sweepingly dismissed the message over a presentation mistake? Ah, it;s Purposely Myopic Pedant Nyr: - I do not think the Bartle list would be a good way to analyze new player accounts at this juncture, as I would think that we have very few resources to determine what kind of player someone is.
- I'm not sure how much Bartle stuff could or should apply to an RPI
Note that the Bartle stuff was used to by Kryos to present his argument in a structured way. while players might not match them, Id be amazed if most people hadn't palyed characters as the suits. Even if nobody ever had it changes nothing. There are no such thing as "Achievers" in an RPI? Fine. People are multifaceted unique snowflakes. "Achiever" is a legitimate facet a person might have. We can meet the OP half way. Blindly Contrarian Nyr showed up in the same post. Again, highlights. Please forgive the redundancy i need to make a point here: - I think we have a good mix of all of those categories on staff right now.
- I do not think the Bartle list would be a good way to analyze new player accounts at this juncture, as I would think that we have very few resources to determine what kind of player someone is. Even if we flat-out asked the player, it may be that their style had plenty to do here and they would have been a poor player. I would rather search for more generic reasons for why someone is playing or why someone is not playing. (This survey stuff will actually be starting next week on a trial basis.)
- The style that you believe is most/least supported is likely influenced by your own experiences and may not necessarily be objectively true for all. In fact, one good or one bad experience (regardless of the experience, because each player has their own definition of good and bad, which is also different from staff's) can enshrine or taint an aspect of anything for you. As you say, you feel achievers are unsupported, yet there is evidence from at least one other player here that this is not the case, so it does seem to be more subjective than objective.
- I'm not sure how much Bartle stuff could or should apply to an RPI, but it's probably worth considering from time to time in very specific cases. I am sure that we do think about the balance of the game itself as well as the focus for the roles that are available, and we have our own goals for building or plotting or what-not.
- he says non-commitally we've got all the types on staff.
- he says we don't have the resources to look at the playerbase's types to figure out what people are so we cant use Kryos' thing to figure out why turnover's so high
- he says kryos' argument is probably subjective because... well. it's convenient to Nyrs argument.
- he says he's not even sure if the thing he was sure is fully represented in staff (1) even exists the fuck at all while wishywashying that it might be really useful but rarely on a case by case and oh my this soup's delicious don't you think?
Here the staff is encourages by Kryos to hire on people who don't spend all their time making friends. the intent is to have more people who like exploring, crafting, and PvP on staff. the intent of the argument is obvious. Sadly he's still using the Bartle types to say that... So naturally its Purposely Myopic Pedant Nyr who ansers: we are not going to change our staffing model to acquire new staff members based on their Bartle type--not the 4-piece older Bartle type and not the 8-piece newer Bartle type. Pedantry at its finest. the obviousness of the suggestion is intentuionally missed by Nyr. I can sum up both quotes from Kryos and Nyr's entire book of a response as this: K: "Hire people with a more diverse interests in MUDing. Also, you tricked me into spending two sentences defending my illustration instead of touting the spirit of my point. Im oblivious that you'll use this to continue springboarding away from what I was trying to say by faulting the way I said it" PMPN: "Im still winging about unimportant shit. Looks like I'm on-topic though doesnt it? since you took my bait, Im gonna keep trolling you into defending your illustration which is irrelevant to the merit of what you were trying to say." He ends on contradicting his earlier post with: If our game is an RPI--focused on roleplaying and an overall story and the stories of our characters--it stands to reason that no, we are not going to fit into a box. So all those boxes the staff fills (1) they can't fit within? damn. shouldn't have been Blindly Contrarian Nyr so early; your mistake's still on the same page. Classic Nyr being condescending and dropping cowardly, indirect insults. he's followed by another appearance by Purposely Myopic Pedant Nyr in the same sentence: I still think it'd be better to view this game through the lens of roleplay and storytelling rather than the lens of "I took an internet test, therefore these changes should be made." We can make improvements and we discuss those regularly, but Bartle categories seems to me to be a pretty flimsy standard for this game. I pointed out Yee, who had pretty strong points against the Bartle categorizations. notice how he still hasn't address ANYTHING of substance in the thread yet? Just keeps whinging about shit that doesn't matter. Prior to this post two posts were made by Patuk who didnt take Nyr's bait in either of them. he/she expands on the spirit of Kryos' argument in this massive post. Nyr completely ignores both posts. in fact Nyr doesn't respond to Patuk at all until this post where Patuk attempts to call Nyr out on his behavior and self-contradiction. Blatantly Lying Nyr responds to Patuk's remark that Nyr's coming off as condescending with this pile of shit: I read what Kryos was saying. I disagreed with it and said as much. Kryos has a very specific set of opinions about what he thinks staff's view on the game is--rather than asking what that is, he is telling us all what he thinks it is. I think it's important to point out when someone is laying something out as objective fact when it is a personal opinion. In both cases where I said "in your opinion", that was the case. Statements: Players are going to find that their Achievement Component desires simply are not supported well or scrutinized to the point that they lose interest in playing. This is an opinion based on a personal belief by one player that Armagedddon doesn't reward one particular type of style. Saying that is his opinion isn't invalidating his belief, but it does invalidate it as stated fact. I didn't even get into the area where he believes staff disagree with him here. To paraphrase, "we do not seem to agree on the fact that players who are not strong social or alternate components or subcomponents are valuable and useful to an RPI game." That is the view Kryos came into this thread with, even after disagreement and opposition to this opinion on his part, he still feels that way. OK, cool, but it doesn't mean it's true objectively, and stating it as fact is incorrect. We can definitely discuss staff views on things but when the starting position is "you think this way, you should change the way you think," how else should that be addressed? "Thank you for sharing your views on our views?" It's all heavily based on personal experience; it would be useful to know why that view is held rather than that the view is held, because that would help in resolving things.
Same thread, more Classic Nyr: No big deal, I was just pointing out that the direction of the game overall is influenced and shaped by the Producers, two of whom have been here longer than you. Being on staff has nothing to do with being active. Nessalin is a particularly bad example for nyr to invoke. Not knocking Ness. I just recall my experiences with him were far apart. And he seemed totally disconnected from the playerbase/direction.
I'm now tired. After this point nyr's successfully run the thread off the rails. Now its trapped in a cycle of remarks about subjectivity. And a healthy dose of shifting the blame onto the player base. Kryos finally partially got his head out of his ass on page 4. I expect Nyr to continue avoiding the point. i suppose someone could make the limp argument Nyr honestly missed the point. That's a blatant lie but it doesn't prevent someone from typing it. Nyr avoids every point by every participant in this thread about weaknesses in the game. instead he focuses on everything besides the point being made. The closest he gets to addressing the real spirit of the argument are sweeping dismissals. Using what? The "it's just your opinion" routine. a classic handwave by Classic Nyr.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 2:36:59 GMT -5
I spoke to Nessalin a total of 3 times while I was on staff. Not for lack of trying at other times. He just tends to idle most of the time while logged in. Right on on the handwave part. As a somewhat nonsensical sidenote (I'm deliriously tired and about to go to sleep in like 30 minutes), did you notice that your abbreviation looks like pimpin (PMPN)? It made me giggle.
But yeah, much of that thread is a perfect example. I've been following it too, and just shaking my head pretty continuously. I feel bad for Kryos for wasting his time like that, and admiration for him that he's willing to put so much time into trying.
|
|
|
Post by lulz on Mar 6, 2014 5:29:10 GMT -5
I wouldn't even know where to start honestly. There are many instances in which Nyr showed how petty he could be, but here's one: I posted what I figured would be my final message on the GDB as a player of Armageddon in IIRC the "What Turned You Off from the Game" thread, wherein I stated that being transferred by staff into the middle of the air after I'd gotten away from my guerrilla campaign against the Allanaki forces rubbed me the wrong way and I was choosing to move on. No hard feelings. Nyr proceeded to attack me, making such bold claims as stating I'd spammed from my point directly to camp. This was of course untrue, and I stated as such. As willing as I was to discuss the matter in a respectful manner, Nyr wouldn't have it. After his unsuccessful attempts to troll bait me into using foul, course language and deriding him, he proceeded to wonder out loud whether or not I would be allowed to remain a member of the GDB, adding that it wouldn't be up to him. I was banned not five minutes after. He then proceeded to expunge the entirety of our exchange from the GDB for reasons only he himself knows. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- He also claimed after Gowan killed Rissa that he at first thought I was a good player, though when faced with his character's death he claimed I wasn't very good. I find that interesting: I've read over your requets re: Gowan's death, and while I will not comment on the IC situation because I am not your clan staff, I do hope you come back for another character in the future. You're a great new player and while it can be quite a blow to lose a first long-lived character--or even a first character who developed a great deal of depth regardless of time played--one of the hardest things about Armageddon that took me a while to learn is that every character has an expiration date. But that just means you can move on to a new story set somewhere different, with a whole new cast. Regardless of whether you return to play here, all the best, - A staff member Maybe this should be a complaint, because Gowan was just too freaking awesome! He always had something going on and kept me wondering. I'm pretty terrible at playing stealth characters and really enjoyed seeing a fully fleshed out one played so well. Gowan was one of the only PCs I felt I had a fully fleshed out relationship with. I miss playing with him! Seriously though, I took way too long sending this. You rock. My personal favorite: Hey there, This may seem like an odd way to get feedback from staff, but as I'm not over your clan I don't really communicate with you much or get a chance to say anything. But I wanted my opinions known! Gowan is one of my favourite PCs alive right now and an absolute joy to watch. He's got depth and three-dimensionality rarely seen in this game, and his internal RP is spectacular. Especially those thinks and feels, MAN. You're doing great for someone so new to the game and I think you add a lot to both the flavour of our world and to Kurac. Keep up the good work and hopefully I'll get a chance to mess with you in good time. - An anonymous staffer (I still don't know who sent this, but I have a fairly good idea) The last one was submitted as kudos by a staff member. It made me feel so good about the game, and that anything was possible if staff would just let you play and develop your character into a three dimensional person with their own faults and strengths. To add: the purpose of me posting the above was not to pat myself on the back, but rather to illustrate just how petty and vindictive Nyr can be. The difference between how certain staff can lift me up as a player and inspire me to REALLY try my best and the pettiness Nyr displays with alarming consistency is simply immeasurable.
|
|
|
Post by lyse on Mar 6, 2014 8:11:39 GMT -5
Maybe it's just me, but my eyes kind of glaze over when I start reading anything Nyr writes. I'm sure this is common.
|
|
|
Post by gloryhound on Mar 6, 2014 13:40:04 GMT -5
My eyes glaze over when I read most anything on the GDB. I mostly lurk - I haven't posted anything there in forever cause 99% of the time, my response would be something along the lines of "what in the actual fuck is wrong with you?" Like that thread about the moons? Fucks sake, its a thread about celestial mechanics in a text-based fantasy world - who gives a shit? The fact that people can pontificate endlessly about that kinda pedantic garbage drives me up the goddamn wall. Sounds like some of that diversity of the playerbase Kyros was talking about, to me. Also, no one is forcing you to read those threads. Also, the moons do have an effect on play, as anyone caught out at night will attest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 14:06:18 GMT -5
He's on a roll in Kryos' thread, I swear.
Quote from: KankWhisperer on Today at 08:03:53 AM Quote from: The7DeadlyVenomz on Today at 07:58:21 AM Haha. You think this is undiplomatic? Man, staff has improved their interaction with us in leaps and bounds. I can't even be mad these days.
You used to also be more free to express your opinions fron my perspective. You didn't have to worry about GDB affecting you in game as much.
Nyr: Whose freedom to express their opinions is being curtailed here? How is the GDB affecting you or anyone in-game?
Kankwhisperer Quote As for affecting you in game, I feel you're too quick to ban personally and not being able to use GDB in clan is a big deal sometimes. Also, I thought GDB can affect your karma.
Nyr: To the former, put in a staff complaint. You've done this before a few times, so you know the process.
Nyr: To the latter, yes. Your communication on the GDB or via e-mail can absolutely be detrimental to your account. However, that's for the best. No one is being forced to troll and flame on the GDB.
So... how is it affecting you in game because as an Admin I don't know this... oh wait, you answered me something we both already knew, and it's true... Let's just accuse you of trolling and flaming because you have an opinion that was in no way negatively expressed... good thing no one can ban me (an admin) for flaming or trolling!
|
|
|
Post by gloryhound on Mar 6, 2014 14:19:42 GMT -5
Nyr: To the latter, yes. Your communication on the GDB or via e-mail can absolutely be detrimental to your account. However, that's for the best. No one is being forced to troll and flame on the GDB. So... how is it affecting you in game because as an Admin I don't know this... oh wait, you answered me something we both already knew, and it's true... Let's just accuse you of trolling and flaming because you have an opinion that was in no way negatively expressed... good thing no one can ban me (an admin) for flaming or trolling! I read this and my futility meter pegged at maximum. Posts to the GDB are wasted effort and won't change anything, they'll only aggravate people. All there is to do is to play the game and stop when it's no longer enjoyable. Unfortunately I'm nearly there. I can't think of a character concept I'd want to play after this current one. Every idea I come up with fails the "is it doable without staff help" check and so is essentially hopeless.
|
|
|
Post by jcarter on Mar 6, 2014 16:17:49 GMT -5
Posts to the GDB are wasted effort and won't change anything, they'll only aggravate people. All there is to do is to play the game and stop when it's no longer enjoyable. If people read the board and take away one thing let it be this. play how you want. no one gives a shit that you decided to stick around and emote chopping carrots during chore time at the Byn. no one cares that you put in the extra effort as a PC merchant to help out other players. The only time things are going to be noted in your account is when staff suspects you of cheating or has a negative comment to make, something you may or may not find out years later with no chance to contest it. maybe you'll get some karma eventually but the people hitting 6-8 points are the ones who have been playing at least 5 years and I'd bet a good percentage of them have gone to more than one player gathering.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2014 20:10:05 GMT -5
The way he poaches the GDB for posts to attack in the most unprofessional, immaturely hostile way is reminiscent of a schoolyard bully emboldened by the presence of his oafish, unquestioning goons. He knows that even if he's wrong, he can still "win" any argument by flexing his power because he's the head admin and because the GDB community these days consists mostly of fawning backpatters who are cowed into subservience as people know that getting on Nyr's bad side will mean obstacles at every turn and a head admin just waiting for an excuse to ban you. Note how little actual discussion takes place there nowadays -- most of the strong-willed people have seen it for the lost cause that it is.
The GDB (and, to a considerable extent, the game itself) has lost its proactive and determined members, and those who were willing to voice a strong opinion. As Anaiah has pointed out elsewhere, the number of new players has shot up in the last year or so, but the actual amount of players is the same. There's a suspicious lack of backbone left in the community, just as there has been a stark absence of initiative and driving force in-game for the last few years. Many of the players who had some dignity and sense have found it difficult to tolerate the administration and the direction of the game since Nyr took over, and it's telling that this is the first time in the history of the RPI genre that people have created a forum dedicated primarily to discussing how bad a game's director is.
|
|
|
Post by BitterFlashback on Mar 6, 2014 22:32:53 GMT -5
i have something to post I need to format first. Will reply in the meantime. I wouldn't even know where to start honestly. There are many instances in which Nyr showed how petty he could be, but here's one: Well if the thread hits 500 pages we'll ask jcarter lock and link it to a new one. Nyr: Whose freedom to express their opinions is being curtailed here? How is the GDB affecting you or anyone in-game? ... snip... Nyr: Your communication on the GDB or via e-mail can absolutely be detrimental to your account. Magnificent. The way he poaches the GDB for posts to attack in the most unprofessional, immaturely hostile way is reminiscent of a schoolyard bully emboldened by the presence of his oafish, unquestioning goons. I completely agree with you. But this thread was about posting examples. i have no doubt you could throw a stone and find a dozen. So... Could you dig up an example of Nyr on the GDB exemplifying his bully mentality and post highlights here?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 7, 2014 5:11:54 GMT -5
I honestly don't care enough about him to waste my time scouring the GDB for suitable examples. It seems a bit obsessive to want a list of "transgressions" as if we're taking him to court or something. We all know how he is, so I don't feel the need to provide quotes or justify my stance when it's not even a two-sided debate. I'd be careful not to let this forum become too much of a circle jerk lest it get too easy for him to dismiss these discussions as biased slander.
|
|
|
Post by jcarter on Mar 7, 2014 7:53:42 GMT -5
I'd be careful not to let this forum become too much of a circle jerk lest it get too easy for him to dismiss these discussions as biased slander. I agree 100% with this sentiment even though I'm pretty sure any legitimate criticism of the producers and the state of the game is framed that way. with that said I'm not going to bother reading every reply and analyzing it or moderating so policing the discussion is up to the posters. edit: and by up to the posters I mean individuals making the actual post not for people to dogpile on others
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Mar 8, 2014 14:08:47 GMT -5
No one gives a fuck about Nyr. However I am all for brutally destroying someone on the internet with their own idiocy. Especially when its Arms head staffer! Hell people have done it to me before. So yeah let him dig his own grave. Staff corruption is well and alive on Arm no matter how much we think the mud has changed from the old days.
|
|