|
Post by sirra on Sept 1, 2018 16:15:56 GMT -5
Nergal was actually good about not posting as his player handle (Cutthroat) on the GDB during his time on staff. I don't know if anyone does that lately, but I seem to remember Malifaxis, bcw81, and Barzalene moving in to help staff in GDB arguments. (Those are Shalooonsh, Akariel, and Renenutet for those lacking staff friends to provide fresh intel.) Pretty sure I mentored Cutthroat when he was a newbie in his first combat clan. Because years later I saw him post in Kuraci, and I had a 'Oh shit, that guy's still around?' moment. This was before he joined staff.
|
|
|
Post by shakes on Sept 1, 2018 16:34:08 GMT -5
The problem I have with sockpuppeting is that some of them are nasty, bitter, and snarky on the forum with their sockpuppets, and you don't know who they are. So there's a tendency to respond in kind. And then that leads to staff retaliation you didn't expect, or at least it can lead to the suspicion of it.
I have several times joined a clan, been well-received and liked in game, and then suddenly when I posted in the role-call thread, one or more characters who were previously nice and easy going with me, mysteriously turn hostile. Some have even then turned on me and killed me.
You're not going to convince me that in game retaliation for forum-related bullshit doesn't happen. I at least have the very strong PERCEPTION that it is happening.
Edit: Yeah, I know that one is staff and one is potentially players, but it's all the same linear problem in my head.
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 1, 2018 21:37:07 GMT -5
The problem I have with sockpuppeting is that some of them are nasty, bitter, and snarky on the forum with their sockpuppets, and you don't know who they are. So there's a tendency to respond in kind. And then that leads to staff retaliation you didn't expect, or at least it can lead to the suspicion of it. I have several times joined a clan, been well-received and liked in game, and then suddenly when I posted in the role-call thread, one or more characters who were previously nice and easy going with me, mysteriously turn hostile. Some have even then turned on me and killed me. You're not going to convince me that in game retaliation for forum-related bullshit doesn't happen. I at least have the very strong PERCEPTION that it is happening. Edit: Yeah, I know that one is staff and one is potentially players, but it's all the same linear problem in my head. It goes beyond perception, it happens often and it happens to an absurd degree. It is the reason why clan alt accounts are so popular on the GDB. Other games do just fine with people knowing who other people play because they have a mature player base. One must wonder why Armageddon's player base seems to run on a steady source of intimidation and shows of force.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 0:48:38 GMT -5
Okey.
Well how about you post a link. Post a thread where Shaloonsh used Malifaxis to support Shalooonsh's own statement? Or same with Akarial, or Renentutet. If the thread isnt removed, it's still there. Prove your statement?
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 2, 2018 5:49:52 GMT -5
Profound.
I'd be happy to, as soon as I have time to trawl through years of GDB posts. I vaguely remember the topic, though, so it should be easy enough.
|
|
jkarr
GDB Superstar
Posts: 2,070
|
Post by jkarr on Sept 2, 2018 6:28:42 GMT -5
Okey. Well how about you post a link. Post a thread where Shaloonsh used Malifaxis to support Shalooonsh's own statement? Or same with Akarial, or Renentutet. If the thread isnt removed, it's still there. Prove your statement? he doesnt have to show their staff acct saying the same thing as their player acct to show that they feel some way based on their player acct posts unless ur trying to use this to find some way to 'prove' his claim abt staff to player accts, which is way more fucking stupid than id expect ur overcareful ass to push on this acct
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 2, 2018 10:14:53 GMT -5
Okey. Well how about you post a link. Post a thread where Shaloonsh used Malifaxis to support Shalooonsh's own statement? Or same with Akarial, or Renentutet. If the thread isnt removed, it's still there. Prove your statement? he doesnt have to show their staff acct saying the same thing as their player acct to show that they feel some way based on their player acct posts unless ur trying to use this to find some way to 'prove' his claim abt staff to player accts, which is way more fucking stupid than id expect ur overcareful ass to push on this acct I don't mind showing proof of staff's deceitful tactics. However, it's probably true that I'm not going to find a staff member's player account supporting their own staff account's statement. Not because I am a liar, but because it simply doesn't work like that. Staff have a policy about who can post under what name on the GDB. Normally, administrators and producers are the ones answering players on the GDB, and storytellers are told to get permission from a higher-level staff member before making a game-related statement on their staff account. However, they don't need to get permission to post as their player account, so what they will often do is use their player account to back up an administrator or producer's statement or provide a show of support. This usually follows with other legitimate players falling in line to voice support for something, because the original sockpuppet already turned the conversation in that direction. If anyone here ever wondered just how the GDB became so sycophantic, now you know the tactic to watch for.
|
|
seuly
Clueless newb
Posts: 103
|
Post by seuly on Sept 2, 2018 10:43:04 GMT -5
Two thoughts today...
...fuck it, I think it is about the Black Moon and that is so just goddamn lazy.
...The first 48 hours of becoming Staff looks like this: read your player notes and see what staff said about you, read your application notes in the request tool and see what staff said about you, see who played who on the GDB, snicker to yourself as you remember you're going to royally shove it to the fucks who fucked you over (staff or players from before), search how skills work or rare recipes, scour the world for where metal or other loot or cool hidden rooms are at and make mental note of using them later on, start what you think is the coolest map ever, make what you think is the coolest and most individual poof in and out, make yourself what you think is the coolest and most individual room and a weapon to go with it to smite your enemies, proceed to actually learn the mechanics of being on staff, and then realize that you're expected to work and work alot, if you log in to play you will be judged with some sideeye from others and no matter what you think you do or believe you know about yourself, you are definitely going to use what you know as Staff to save your character and fuck over others.
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Sept 2, 2018 11:41:00 GMT -5
Noted Liar Nergal was actually good about not posting as his player handle (Cutthroat) on the GDB during his time on staff. I don't know if anyone does that lately, but I seem to remember Malifaxis, bcw81, and Barzalene moving in to help staff in GDB arguments. (Those are Shalooonsh, Akariel, and Renenutet for those lacking staff friends to provide fresh intel.) Barzalene is good people. She's a military veteran, cancer survivor, and is not a reactionary 30s-something guy with autistic tendencies. I've said it before and I'll say it again about Nergal, but cutthroat as a poster on the GDB was a Good Dude. It's quite possible that inheriting the mess Nyr left behind was just too much for him to fucking handle or deal with; you have to admit, it was a big mess. In all of my years of reading GDB posts by Cutthroat, he was not only funny and genuinely nice, but he was never really an asshole to anyone at all and seemed like someone who'd be good to smoke a J with. I don't think anyone could have walked right into Arm's staff as some kind of face of the game after Nyr and handle it well. As far as imms helping their friends goes, look... I have had multiple people that I was friends with over the years eventually become staff. Even one or two that I introduced to the game in the first place. One of these is even one of my *best* friends to this day (we're 32/33 and starting playing when we were 14), and do you know how many times I asked/he offered to share OOC info, just to have something to talk about? Not ever. Not once. Never, and the same goes for all of the rest of the players I've known who have been staff. You mentioned Barzalene. I knew her when she as a player, have met her in person, and knew her when she at one point was on staff. Just like when other IRL friends of mine were on staff, not people I knew solely through the game, it always just seemed like an unspoken thing that what they were doing as staff wasn't a conversation point. It just seemed like an *extremely* taboo thing to do, and it is incredibly unfortunate for *everyone* who plays the game when trust like this occurs, especially given how small the playerbase is and how serious the IC/OOC line SHOULD BE... *especially* when you're staff. But that's just my experience, you know? I hope it helps explain why, in part, I find the idea that staff members actively interfering OOCly or helping out their friends to be hard to swallow: because, despite knowing a lot of people who've historically been on staff, I've never experienced it much. Then again, it has been a long, long time since I communicated OOCly regularly with Arm players. Anyway, thanks for answering my questions, mehtastic. The hate boner comment was because you've said that you would like to, uhhh, destroy the game, if I'm remembering correctly. I think, maybe, a few years ago, when Nyr was still basically the face of the game and things were really messy all over, I called for a boycott once? I have hated various aspects of how things were handled in Arm and originally started posted here to help bring attention to those deficiencies after exhausting other avenues, but it's hard for me to say that I've just wanted the game to end. Instead, it goes back to the whole "light is the best disinfectant" idea: if corruption is happening, it should be exposed to as many as possible (these forums provide, objectivelly, the truest manner through which to accomplish this, for better or worse), and the problems should be repaired. Only because of these forums, some of that has already happened on ArmageddonMUD. Personally, to some degree, I'm proud of that, and grateful for an uncensored place where people have been able to collectively call BS on unfair practices. Let's face it: Ranging back to probably the inception of ArmageddonMUD, there have at times been staff members who abused their positions to increase their own IC/OOC power, the IC power of their characters, and the IC/OOC power of their friends, even at times going as far to abuse IC information to PK characters, help their friends PK other characters, levy unfair treatment due to positive bias, drop items for their own characters or the characters of their friends, and more.Unfortunately, the player base has close to zero percent capacity to know when it is happening, save in the form of leaks posted here or, in previous cases of Halaster and Bhag (and to some degree, Nyr), the problem becoming so pronounced that players start to put things together for themselves, resulting in an outcry, whatever the platform might be. Further complicating these issues is the fact that, when there are instances of staff facing punishment for breaking the rules, the staff do not disclose such information to the playerbase. To some degree, this is understandable, but it does absolutely nothing when it comes to staff accountability. Players hearing about staff members abusing the game second-hand and not knowing whether or not they were punished or otherwise held accountable is disconcerting. The problem is complex because no producer would want to publicly lynch a player who became staff yet fell short or cheated as humans in general are suspectible to, but players having to learn that problems like this have occured or are occuring through leaks or whistleblowers serves only to foster distrust. We are at a time, in history, where most progressively-minded people hold whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning in high regard. Yes, in terms of severity, warcrimes are a lot different from suspected abuses on a text-based game. Despite that, in any network of social relationships where corruption/unfairness/arbitrariness/abuse may be fostered by an only-infrequently porous wall of secrecy, those who give up perks to expose rule-breaking should not be crucified. For fuck's sake, even Manning was pardoned by Obama for exposing problems that had been going on, so, as a game played by mostly fairly intelligent people, it should be hard to justify removing the karma of, brickwalling, banning, or otherwise holding bias toward people who have demonstrated abuse of power or any of a number of problems that are hard to hold people accountable for. It is important to note that there, to me, is a stark difference between exposing abuse and, say, releasing a leaked version of the game's code to the public. Whistleblowing, when it comes to OOC abuse by staff, prejudices, cheating, etc, is very different from spoiling ongoing plots, IC info about contemporary PC/PKs, posting secret documentation, or otherwise ruining secrets of the game. Personally, I have not read the code, the leaked wikis, or much along those lines. For example, when jcarter pointed out that the Muark documentation was available several days ago to call it a Mary Sue clan, i was previously unaware that those documents were available to everyone, now. I have no idea about the extent of what the code leaks or wiki leaks reveal because I would rather remain as ignorant about IC stuff as possible unless it relates to abuse/staff cheating/fundamental problems.
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 2, 2018 11:56:34 GMT -5
Just to clarify, I've never said I wanted to destroy the game. @qwerty has assigned that motive to me but it simply isn't true. I have, however, said that the game is currently on a path that is destroying itself.
I'm of the opinion that exposing abuse is the only way to treat it; however, other forms of information help provide context to abuse. The code release shows, among other things, that staff tasks are not as difficult or time-consuming as they like to pretend; that it is extremely easy to monitor players and difficult to ignore actions or wishes when a staff member is online; and that there is a large amount of simply unused code that, if reactivated, would help provide additional content to the game, and yet the game is growing increasingly stagnant. You are free to read or ignore it as you wish.
|
|
|
Post by shakes on Sept 2, 2018 12:25:55 GMT -5
Two thoughts today... ...fuck it, I think it is about the Black Moon and that is so just goddamn lazy. I don't think it's about the black moon. I'm not in the rolecall so I don't know for sure, but I've seen a couple of weird things while I was roaming around in the wilderness. New and interesting things that weren't there the last time I went through and seem to tie in. I'm hoping it's something cool.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 2, 2018 13:48:11 GMT -5
he doesnt have to show their staff acct saying the same thing as their player acct to show that they feel some way based on their player acct posts unless ur trying to use this to find some way to 'prove' his claim abt staff to player accts, which is way more fucking stupid than id expect ur overcareful ass to push on this acct I don't mind showing proof of staff's deceitful tactics. However, it's probably true that I'm not going to find a staff member's player account supporting their own staff account's statement. Not because I am a liar, but because it simply doesn't work like that. Staff have a policy about who can post under what name on the GDB. Normally, administrators and producers are the ones answering players on the GDB, and storytellers are told to get permission from a higher-level staff member before making a game-related statement on their staff account. However, they don't need to get permission to post as their player account, so what they will often do is use their player account to back up an administrator or producer's statement or provide a show of support. This usually follows with other legitimate players falling in line to voice support for something, because the original sockpuppet already turned the conversation in that direction. If anyone here ever wondered just how the GDB became so sycophantic, now you know the tactic to watch for.
First of all. Storytellers posted on their own accord plenty. It's true that they never counterdict each other in public. Is that ... really surprising? I would imagine this is a similar case in any organization with a hierarchy. From political parties, to businesses, to ... whatever else.
But as player handles. They're expressing their opinions. Are you implying that Staff should not be posting as their player handles on the GDB?
|
|
|
Post by lyse on Sept 2, 2018 18:04:30 GMT -5
This isn’t about that though.
It’s about staff cheating, sockpuppeting, and using alt handles to deflect. In some cases they might not be related, but at worse they are.
Let’s not forget a lot of threads get deleted, particularly when someone rages out. Usually when that happens there’s some pretty strong accusations in there, if you’re lucky enough to catch them.
|
|
|
Post by sirra on Sept 2, 2018 18:33:29 GMT -5
Okey.
Well how about you post a link. Post a thread where Shaloonsh used Malifaxis to support Shalooonsh's own statement? Or same with Akarial, or Renentutet. If the thread isnt removed, it's still there. Prove your statement? It's kind've hard to search the GDB for past posts you've been involved in debates with staff, if your account has been banned. Virtually every argument on the GDB between a player and staff, turned truly catty and revealing, that I can recall, was eventually deleted. At the least, every thread that I participated in. In fact, part of what lead to my banning from the GDB was a fight with staff, wherein a staffer modified my post to make fun of me and changed the content of it (deleting a huge chunk), and then when I complained of staff sabotaging my own posts in a truly unprofessional way and putting words in my mouth, I got bitched out by Nessalin, finally issued a tepid apology, and then the thread was deleted. A little while later, I called Lizzie the GDB equivalent of a white knight, and BOOM, that was apparently REAL harassment and worthy of banning me. It would've been a lot more harassy if I'd used my staff credentials to personally edit her posts, delete her points, and make fun of her. Your attempt to defend staff's behavior on the GDB is truly confounding.
|
|
|
Post by lyse on Sept 2, 2018 19:29:38 GMT -5
It's on purpose.
|
|