Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 23, 2018 2:28:12 GMT -5
Weeeell. Vanth's been gone since 2011. You joined these forums in 2014? Was someone perpetuating her bias after she quit?
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Jul 23, 2018 10:29:14 GMT -5
I came here after Nyr banned me - the first time since Vanth I had ever been banned on GDB/had karma removed/any kinda major issues at all - from the GDB when I brought up what Vanth had done, again, in public, and asking why I was still being punished. Because I was still being penalized from her initial punishment, literally YEARS later, maybe 7-8? I felt like that, anyway, that is was the same punishment sticking to me and would be permanent. It was really frustrating, especially considering I was reflecting on it a lot as my job at the time was cultivating medical cannabis in isolation deep, deep in the Colorado Rockies. Didn't have a whole lot much else to think about.
I can't EXACTLY remember how long her punishment had stuck, but I had gotten into it with Nyr almost as soon as he made staff when another player (whose name I've written here before but won't repeat now) told me how Nyr, after assuming control of my clan (one of the largest at the time), had used an NPC to tell that other player's NPC to kill my character. We really didn't get off on the right foot.
Maybe it would have been better if that player had not told me how that NPC had been used, but for a new imm to use a staff avatar to throw a, I dunno, 80 day merchant under the bus... It just caused me to dislike Nyr from the onset because, ICly, it did not make sense to me, especially considering no NPCs interacted with my character at all. I mean, if you as staff are going to use an NPC to interact with a templar over a problem, it seems like he would have similarly used an NPC to discuss the matter with my PC at the time.
With what I've seen in the game recently, I would like to believe that an NPC would have been used to interact with my character as well - or corresponded somehow. But there was zero communication from him, except hearing after the fact from a RL friend, face-to-face, in person, that he had used an NPC from my char's merchant house to condemn that character.
He came made staff, was set over my clan, and used an avatar NPC to basically condemn that char... This was in like 2006-7.
I later tried to make amends with Nyr, via email, and he basically told me to Fuck Off, that I would never play in his clans again, etc.
I never felt like being punished initially by Vanth was fair, and it continued to bother me for quite some time, especially since I felt like I had been following the rules of the game. Furthermore, I felt that, since Nyr obviously loathed me and had risen to the prominence of Sanvean, the punishment/bias would be indefinite.
Around that time, this board was created, and I read more and more stories about how people had been treated by Nyr. At first, I was *very* contemptuous of these forums, I mean, I really hated the very idea of them existing despite how similar they were to IRC forums and AIM group chats that had been present ever since I played Arm. I really loved the game and thought the idea of forums like this was bad, period. It reminded me of how, when I was playing gypsies, people would talk shit about gypsies (not knowing that I was one a lot of the time) on IRC because of the favoritism or whatever, which I would brush off as them being jealous of not having "earned it" like I had.
Then, I started reading more and more stories about how Nyr had treated people, and I was like, well fuck, there is obviously a REASON that so many people feel this way.
So, getting back to the Vanth thing: when I brought it up on the GDB to talk about it publicly in 2014 because I felt like I was being indefinitely punished over something OOC, Nyr got into an arguement with me, flamed me hard, edited the arguement to detract my credible points without indicating to readers that he had done so, and then banned me. I feel like we both could have handled the situation way differently, but Nyr obviously had a grudge against me, going to so far as to tell me I would NEVER play in one of his clans, and was now basically the new Sanvean. So, again, it felt like my punishment was going to be permanent - a punishment, again, that even Nyr agreed had been too harsh. It just didn't make sense, and I think that's because Vanth's OOC come-on to me had been rejected, causing her to arbitrarily and heavy-handedly punish me for using a certain Nilaz skill to travel back and forth between Nak and Tuluk.
This was justified ICly by claiming the NPC Nenyukis would have noticed my character entering an apartment and not leaving for days at a time, which seem shoddy anyway to me because, even IRL, I can go days without leaving home. Furthermore, if it was an IC slip-up on my character's part, then why try to levy an IC punishment (sending two half-giant NPCs after a Nilazi with less than 20 days played), fail, and then punish me OOCly for "abusing" the code?
I did not feel as though I had been abusing the code - and I still don't. If an IC mistake was made and my character was deemed in the eyes of that staffer to have made a mistake, it should not have spilled over into OOC removal of my karma after IC avenues to "catch" my character failed because a staffer, in a planned ambush, failed to kill a weak-ass mage with two HG Tuluki warriors. The fact that the OOC punishment stuck so long after Vanth is what I got into an argument with Nyr about; it and his response and my feelings that the punishment would remain indefinite that led me to begin posting here, especially after reading so many other people's stories about OOC problems with Nyr. I realized I wasn't the only one.
Now, there is a fair karma review system in place. A player knows, in no uncertain terms, what they SHOULD BE DOING and SHOULD NOT BE DOING in order to have a chance to have their karma raised.
This was not the case when I joined these forums, and it seemed to me as though, with Nyr then acting in Sanvean's capacity, that I would never be able to overcome a punishment levied almost a decade prior, a punishment that seemed entirely unfair and rooted in OOC bias, anyway.
Does that make sense at all?
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Jul 23, 2018 12:33:12 GMT -5
One thing that sticks out to me about the Facebook group "discussion," where Vanth, no longer on staff at this point, came out swinging at me in a really weak fashion that flat-out exposed her contempt was how she and another female claimed I was trivializing women who had been sexually assaulted by making the claim that Vanth's OOC-coming-on-to-me and subsequent rejection influenced her.
In reality, while I have never been raped, I *have* been sexually assaulted as a male while fresh out of boot camp in a holding company before entering an Infantry Training Battalion. I was only 18 and had just spent 3 months doing any and everything I was ordered to, so I was still in a heavily conditioned state; otherwise, I feel like I would have fought it more. The NCO who did this to me threatened to have me kicked out of the USMC and forbidden from entering an ITB company if I told anyone. I had only said anything about this once in my entire life before the topic cropped up during that discussion.
The very fact that those arguing with me about that in the Facebook Arm group assumed that I had never been sexually assaulted wasn't really cool and does relate to contemporary discussions, like the MeToo thing and how males can be affected just as much as females. It does happen, has happened to me, and it was wrong for those arguing with me on the Arm FB group to assume it doesn't happen to males; it does.
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Jul 23, 2018 16:32:00 GMT -5
To clarify, out of playing ArmageddonMUD for a long fucking time, I have not seen or heard of many other examples of this beyond my own. Then again, even when playing, I have had almost zero OOC contact *about the game* with friends for nearly a decade. I am part of zero OOC cliques of people outside of friends I made when APMs were a thing ten years ago, and, even in the times when these forums were BURSTING with critiques of the game... I can't really remember reading any stories about staff members sexually harassing or other being creeps to players.
During that time of sorta intense revolt, when Nyr was still essentially running the entire fucking game, I feel like, if there had been serious issues with staff members creeping on players on a wide scale, it would have been pounced upon. It didn't happen, so I do not buy into the idea that imms creeping on players is widespread.
Now, is it wrong for a staff member to OOCly approach and try to hit on/begin something romantic with a player? Of course not, and it wouldn't surprise me if that had happened.
I feel like it did happen to me, though. I mean, Vanth (crymerci) sent me this really weird message on AIM, something along the lines of, "I didn't think a guy like you would ever go for someone like mean," with the implication being that she thought I liked her... when I didn't find her attractive, nor had I said anything, to my knowledge, to lead her to believe that I was somehow attracted to her. It was a really strange message, and, since I was in the process of reducing my OOC communication, I blocked her as I had blocked many others, often for no reason at all except to be removed from the prospect of discussing the game and IC stuff, OOCly.
I believe this hurt her feelings, upset her, made her angry, or... something, and her resentment carried over when she made staff and climbed the ranks high enough to at least remove most of my good karma.
Again, I have heard of no other stories like this beyond my own, and I am reluctant to believe Looonsh did what has been claimed. Even if he (or any other staffers) came onto a player, I feel that would be okay, as long as, if rejection is the result, no grudges are held.
This isn't a corporation or the military. Fraternizing or attempting to do so should be okay, as long as the staff member does not allow that rejection to influence future interactions with that player, including but not limited to plot involvement, severity of punishments, lack of quality from mastercrafted items, missing out on special roles, etc.
In my case, I stand by what I said way before shit like Kevin Spacey being exposed hit the media and caused many to come forward with allegations of mistreatment/abuse. It just so happens to align with what happened with Vanth and this MeToo movement, but I think it is an uncommon occurance on ArmageddonMUD, yet one that should not be dismissed like my complaints were for years.
|
|
faroukel
Displaced Tuluki
What's a story without a villain?
Posts: 201
|
Post by faroukel on Jul 25, 2018 15:28:29 GMT -5
One need only look to Delerak and SoI to see how one admins negative bias rolls over into new staff incarnations.
It's like a kid shitting his pants in public school. That stink going to linger a long time, even after years have passed and they in in a new class.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2018 18:27:29 GMT -5
Would you be willing to elaborate? I never really got involved with SoI, but I'd be curious to hear the story.
Delerak has a shitty, albeit well deserved, stigma. I'd be curious to see how he'd do in a mud entirely different to Armageddon.
|
|
faroukel
Displaced Tuluki
What's a story without a villain?
Posts: 201
|
Post by faroukel on Jul 26, 2018 9:43:04 GMT -5
I don't think its like a secret and Delerak's spoken of it quite openly in the past, but I'll leave the majority of it for him to fill in if he feels so disposed.
But the jist of it was: An admin decided they disliked Delerak, most likely for his rather frank talk on the games forums.
Delerak was banned, but had the wherewithal to of course bypass IP bans.
Everytime (for literally years afterwards, with new staffers shuffled in and out) something seemed odd, or out of place, especially with a new player, it must be that GOD DAMN DELERAK MESSING EVERYTHING UP.
A veritable witchhunt.
The guy was guilty of wanting to play a game, being able to do so despite not especially being welcome for rather obtuse reasons, and for speaking his mind on a medium design to speak your mind.
I think it was only like, a year or two ago, where one of the former head admins who drank the dastardly-Delerak-juice stepped up and said 'yea, we were totally in the wrong and it was stupid." albeit nearly a decade after the fact.
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Jul 26, 2018 17:35:54 GMT -5
People grow up and change.
Delerak and I have been playing the game for mostly the same length, and, yes, as far back as my beginning days, he earned the ire of Sanvean and others.
Interestingly, he was the one who approached WotC with the possibility of Dark Sun copywrite infringement, which impacted ArmageddonMUD in very serious ways, causing the end of many races and paving the road to what would eventually become the Arm 2.0 project.
I remember reading a thread about all of that on an external source not long ago, but, meh.
A now-deceased ArmageddonMUD player, j0ram, the kind of player who was allowed to play gypsy witches despite having problems with Sanvean, also agreed that these changes were occuring as a result of the desire of some to more-readily monetize ArmageddonMUD with independently-published fiction (which would have been impossible if DarK Sun materil were heavily incorporated, save in the face of lawsuits).
Anyway, if he was using the name Delerak on SoI, then his reputation undoubtedly preceded him, stigma and all.
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Jul 27, 2018 10:26:00 GMT -5
There is a single, strong relationship between the way Delerak was treated, the way Kronibas was allegedly treated by Vanth, and the way Shalooonsh's alleged victims were treated: an unhealthy obsession with control and power, concentrated in Armageddon's staff team.
Armageddon certainly isn't the only MUD that suffers from an administrative stranglehold, but it's one of the biggest ones that do. But this is the shit that happens when staff don't rein themselves in, and are left to do whatever they want. The stain of the staff team's past will remain on Armageddon until they hold everyone accountable for what they did, admit that they made mistakes, and publicly apologize to all those affected. But the staff have no one left that is willing to investigate internally and fix the structure from within.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2018 16:40:00 GMT -5
I agree with you, Mehtastic.
That said, I dont think the bench of replacement options are deep enough to replace half of current staff, even if you could get them to step down. 1 in every couple raised to staff will have the capability and time to stick with it.
Is there any credible way to document and manage a mending of fences without tossing more than 2 staff members out?
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Jul 28, 2018 7:51:17 GMT -5
I agree with you, Mehtastic. That said, I dont think the bench of replacement options are deep enough to replace half of current staff, even if you could get them to step down. 1 in every couple raised to staff will have the capability and time to stick with it. Is there any credible way to document and manage a mending of fences without tossing more than 2 staff members out? Probably not. But staff have needed to learn to tighten their belts for a very long time. There is simply no way to justify a 15-member staff team for a game that notoriously has very little going on compared to other roleplaying games with smaller staff and a larger playerbase. It's possible to do more with less, if the smaller team actually breaks down what they have to do and distributes work evenly, instead of treating all forms of work like something to be minimized and avoided. By comparison, Arx has four staff members if I recall correctly, and 507 (as of today) registered players. Players are allowed to have up to two characters, so if we assume every single player has two characters, that's ~253 players. And yet somehow, there are daily events and plots are actively progressing, because staff have established systems on how they distribute information and plot hooks in a fair and timely fashion. So what's the difference between Arx and Armageddon? Arx has an established standard for work ethic and a no-tolerance policy for bad behavior that taints the community; for example, sexual harassment. Armageddon has players that join staff to be part of the penthouse club and get all the perks that come with it, and any such standards for bad behavior are only applied to the people who aren't a part of the club.
|
|
|
Post by yourvisiongoesblack on Jul 29, 2018 0:37:47 GMT -5
There is a single, strong relationship between the way Delerak was treated, the way Kronibas was allegedly treated by Vanth, and the way Shalooonsh's alleged victims were treated: an unhealthy obsession with control and power, concentrated in Armageddon's staff team. Armageddon certainly isn't the only MUD that suffers from an administrative stranglehold, but it's one of the biggest ones that do. But this is the shit that happens when staff don't rein themselves in, and are left to do whatever they want. The stain of the staff team's past will remain on Armageddon until they hold everyone accountable for what they did, admit that they made mistakes, and publicly apologize to all those affected. But the staff have no one left that is willing to investigate internally and fix the structure from within. I think Delerak took a certain delight in stuff he did. He could write more about this than I. I have never trolled the game or tried to cause problems within the game, even making PK-oriented chars, much at all. I just don't think people should be punished or have their IC goals thwarted, even down to petty mastercraft submissions, because a staff members holds a grudge and allows them to influence their treatment of players. But people do hold grudges. It doesn't have to be something as dramatic as ignoring romantic advances, but small shit, like, oh, I played with this guy and thought he sucked. Or PK'd you or one your buddies... petty stuff. Unfortunately, I think it does happen. I look at the staff list and know scarcely any of them (as staffers), so I am hesitant to say anything at all about them. But you can tell that a staffer has a tendency to be overly-aggressive or just a dick fairly easily by what they sometimes write on the GDB. I can only think of one staffer in particular right now who regularly posts like that, but, even without reading the GDB much, it's just easy to see that they'd be the type of person to escalate shit OOCly and hold grudges. Had these forums been around in the Bhag/Halaster stays, I'm sure people would have written just as much as some of their stuff as Nyr's; unlike Nyr, though, they did at least try to make things way more fun for people as a whole and were never even close to abrasive as Nyr was OOCly. I have only seen the behavior of Nyr in maybe a couple of other staffers. Some people are just nicer than others, and it goes a long way when dealing with a game like this. Nyr did not have the capacity or patience to accomplish this, essentially poisoning a large part of the game, the effects of which are still felt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2018 1:47:16 GMT -5
This whole thing with Vanth. While it's rather callous to say that since she's been gone for an age and a half, the affect on Arm is sort of moot. But that's how it is. I somehow doubt that Nyr's dislike of you was due to Vanth. It was rather difficult to really understand why did Nyr dislike people. Just a basic matter of being a dick. With Vanth. I would say majority of staff right now never even interacted with Vanth in any close capacity. I doubt many remember that she even existed.
|
|
jkarr
GDB Superstar
Posts: 2,070
|
Post by jkarr on Jul 29, 2018 3:45:44 GMT -5
This whole thing with Vanth. While it's rather callous to say that since she's been gone for an age and a half, the affect on Arm is sort of moot. But that's how it is. I somehow doubt that Nyr's dislike of you was due to Vanth. It was rather difficult to really understand why did Nyr dislike people. Just a basic matter of being a dick. With Vanth. I would say majority of staff right now never even interacted with Vanth in any close capacity. I doubt many remember that she even existed. bolded is true only if u werent a vet (10+ years) during his staff tenure
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,695
|
Post by mehtastic on Jul 29, 2018 7:38:32 GMT -5
yourvisiongoesblack, of course people hold grudges. It's practically a requirement for joining staff. Leave it to @qwerty to dismiss stories of sexual abuse, as usual. With all the dismissal of sexual abuse he does you might think he's a rapist himself.
|
|