|
|
Post by jonsmith on Feb 11, 2016 2:14:22 GMT -5
On a bag within a bag?
I am guessing no, because this guy who always is carrying shady shit, has to pull bag outta bag, open bag, get shady shit.
|
|
jkarr
GDB Superstar
Posts: 2,070
|
Post by jkarr on Feb 11, 2016 2:52:41 GMT -5
good guess basicly their metagaming because they know syntax prob doesnt support 'peek target's bag's bag'
|
|
jesantu
Displaced Tuluki
Posts: 390 
|
Post by jesantu on Feb 11, 2016 4:43:43 GMT -5
Or he was smuggling spice. Bag within a bag within a bag worked last time I tried it. Of course posting that here could result in an update....oh nevermind, that's impossible, imms don't read this board.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime Minister Sinister on Feb 11, 2016 5:30:18 GMT -5
Or he was smuggling spice. Bag within a bag within a bag worked last time I tried it. Of course posting that here could result in an update....oh nevermind, that's impossible, imms don't read this board. They fixed that a couple of years ago. Or something, 'cause I've gotten busted at the gate with a pinch that was inside of a bag that was inside of a bag. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2016 7:05:31 GMT -5
You need to put that shit up the ass of a mount.
|
|
Patuk
Shartist
Posts: 556
|
Post by Patuk on Feb 11, 2016 7:06:46 GMT -5
Peeking inside double-layered bags doesn't work. Source: I'm that one guy who isn't grumble and plays elves.
|
|
