|
Post by gringoose on Sept 21, 2019 2:42:23 GMT -5
In all the time I've played Arm, it's never seemed like I was in a den of pedophiles. A significant portion of my PCs were under age youths so that gives me a perspective to comment on this. My PCs have been propositioned but it always seemed to be by people that had little to no standards rather than exclusively propositioning me. It never bothered me.
The worst part about this change is that it's going to kill guaranteed AI agility unless you prioritize it.
|
|
|
Post by BitterFlashback on Sept 21, 2019 4:33:34 GMT -5
Where was all this criticism when you were all actively playing? The staff created a sockpuppet account with a tracker pixel in its signature and banned people for posting here. They advertised their campaign of suppression, just without including their methods. That's in addition to regularly banning or stripping karma from people they thought they could identify. We once inherited an Arm player who never posted here prior to getting banned because the staff confused him/her with someone who did post here. It's a real mystery why most of our members started posting after they were done with Arm. To your point, however, I never encountered it so I didn't know it was there. I wrongly assumed the staff would crack down on it if it happened. Given how many other things I've complained about in the game, I think I should have some cred when I say I'd have condemned it sooner if I was aware of it earlier than now. Post from the reddit thread. Shaleah pulls all the stops, muddying the waters to discredit Exodus's criticism about pedophile content in Armageddon. The bullshit she posted is fierce. You covered most of what she did wrong so I'll just fill in the gaps. Oh, to any defenders of Arm: I do not claim to know how large this underground group is. I'm just criticizing the moronic defense of the game I was forced to read. That's not playing Devil's Advocate. That's deflecting from the point there are pedophiles bonding with each other while co-authoring child porn. Playing a 13 year old who gets mixed up in drugs, alcohol, and violence doesn't make you a troubled 13 year old in real life. Explicitly acting out banging a 13 year old may make you into a pedophile in real life. Yes, ShaLeah, a player writing child porn can be judged for that. The thing that should disturb you is the group of people writing child porn while couching it as role playing. You shouldn't be arguing this is somehow worrisome behavior due to some absurd implication that having a consensual child porn co-author somehow makes the whole affair moral. Your defense of players simulating sex acts with children is the rules say "it's not taboo in-character". Congratulations on defeating the argument he didn't make about how other characters should react. I bet the fictional version of him. whose non-existent argument you just crushed, will need to go on a suicide watch from that epic defeat. However, back in the real world, this is a shameless dodging of the point. If someone draws porn involving a character that looks like a 6 year old girl and says she's 18, she's a child and everyone fucking knows it. You used the imagery of a child; you're depicting a child. That's how the image is going to be interpreted. This isn't rocket science. Defending it by saying the adult character involved in the sex isn't a pedo misses the point that the artist, writer, and readers are the pedos being criticized. Making 13 the age someone is considered an adult is not the same as saying humans reach physical and emotional maturity at 13. As for the lack of rules against pedophilia... the term for that is "tacit endorsement". "Perverse" is the kindest word to describe seeking sexual stimulation involving children, simulated or otherwise. "Evil" would be more accurate. It's not that I know what their stated motives for wanting to role play that are. It's that there's really only a handful of motives (edge lording, being a pedo, and being a pedo edgelord) and none of them make writing child porn into a morally-defensible activity.
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 21, 2019 4:52:23 GMT -5
The bitching you're going to hear is from the "other side", the people who think it's insane that the tooth-pulling process of getting anything done in Armageddon was accomplished with one rowdy reddit post. The discussion wasn't had on the GDB: because it would have been unproductive on the GDB. That's the thing with these communities that reject conventional reason. They control the dialogue, they tell themselves that "13 is totally fine for the setting", and they end up looking like fools at a critical external glance. I'm curious to know what the people who think that Exodus was just a shadowgoblin think. The people who had the "bad taste in their mouth" that Exodus was trying to get Arm players to, well, start an exodus from the game. I guess in their minds, a single shadowboard poster got Armageddon to change a major policy within a day? Or was it staff who graciously decided, on their own and totally without the pressure of losing their domain registrar's support, that they should raise the age of their child characters?
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 21, 2019 4:58:55 GMT -5
Easy solution, happy life. This is the right move. You could go on to argue that the 16 year olds are still going to pretend to be kids to scratch that kink: that's doubtlessly going to happen. It always happens. They should have raised it to 18 specifically to curtail that behavior. Instead they left enough wiggle room to keep the players they'd lose if they did that. Staff don't apparently have a plan to deal with characters that are currently in the 13-15 year range for their race, so they're going to be a hot commodity until they reach the age of consent. The moral of the story in the end is that staff don't like having conversations they can't control. Voice your concerns about the game on the biggest soapbox you can, and things will change.
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Sept 21, 2019 8:17:37 GMT -5
they changed it because of the reddit post? wow this is definitely not the game it used to be. I'm pretty surprised by that, it must have been the threat of the godaddy thing. When I posted on the WOTC forums it lit a fire under them as well, even though my post was just asking the darksun community what they thought, everyone was in unanimous agreement it was a darksun ripoff, except for sanvean and others that came over to defend the game but they were pretty much dismissed by the wotc community. I will still get shit for that post no matter what else I do on arm. Apparently im the reason they killed halflings and kanks? lol
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 21, 2019 8:36:55 GMT -5
they changed it because of the reddit post? wow this is definitely not the game it used to be. I'm pretty surprised by that, it must have been the threat of the godaddy thing. When I posted on the WOTC forums it lit a fire under them as well, even though my post was just asking the darksun community what they thought, everyone was in unanimous agreement it was a darksun ripoff, except for sanvean and others that came over to defend the game but they were pretty much dismissed by the wotc community. I will still get shit for that post no matter what else I do on arm. Apparently im the reason they killed halflings and kanks? lol Like I said, staff don't like having conversations they can't control. It forces them to change a game they don't want to change, in order to meet certain legal requirements. In your case it was related to IP, in this case it was related to child erotica. Armageddon is the game it always was: defiant in the face of legality and ethics until there's too much attention on that defiance.
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Sept 21, 2019 8:47:02 GMT -5
I'm no lawyer but the legality of an online roleplaying game allowing prepubescent characters is very suspect to me. I seriously doubt that would hold up in court. A lot of the sick fucks on this show get acquitted as well it's just not publicized. Legality is how good your lawyer is. On the other side of this stupid ass discussion is fantasy. If someone wants to live out a fantasy online? I am all for that. Especially on the off chance that they don't go take that fantasy into the real world. That's what a lot of RP games are about, escapism, living out a fantasy. I have a simple outlook so long as you're not hurting other people I'm typically okay with it. Doesn't mean that kids haven't been harmed on Arm, I have no idea, but that is highly dubious to think that someone is harmed by playing an online game equivalent to a chat room.
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Sept 21, 2019 8:48:45 GMT -5
they changed it because of the reddit post? wow this is definitely not the game it used to be. I'm pretty surprised by that, it must have been the threat of the godaddy thing. When I posted on the WOTC forums it lit a fire under them as well, even though my post was just asking the darksun community what they thought, everyone was in unanimous agreement it was a darksun ripoff, except for sanvean and others that came over to defend the game but they were pretty much dismissed by the wotc community. I will still get shit for that post no matter what else I do on arm. Apparently im the reason they killed halflings and kanks? lol Like I said, staff don't like having conversations they can't control. It forces them to change a game they don't want to change, in order to meet certain legal requirements. In your case it was related to IP, in this case it was related to child erotica. Armageddon is the game it always was: defiant in the face of legality and ethics until there's too much attention on that defiance. They aren't changing it because of legality they are changing it because they don't know any better. How many other MUDs allow pre-teen PCs? I am almost certain that "sex muds" already exist and this goes on to a much more extreme extent, if it was illegal these muds would be shut down.
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Sept 21, 2019 8:51:51 GMT -5
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 21, 2019 8:52:51 GMT -5
I'm no lawyer but the legality of an online roleplaying game allowing prepubescent characters is very suspect to me. I seriously doubt that would hold up in court. A lot of the sick fucks on this show get acquitted as well it's just not publicized. Legality is how good your lawyer is. On the other side of this stupid ass discussion is fantasy. If someone wants to live out a fantasy online? I am all for that. Especially on the off chance that they don't go take that fantasy into the real world. That's what a lot of RP games are about, escapism, living out a fantasy. I have a simple outlook so long as you're not hurting other people I'm typically okay with it. Doesn't mean that kids haven't been harmed on Arm, I have no idea, but that is highly dubious to think that someone is harmed by playing an online game equivalent to a chat room. You make a fair point regarding legality, but I brought up legality in reference to the intellectual property claim WotC had. I brought up ethics to refer to this particular matter. That being said: - child porn is illegal and erotica with children in it is on very shaky ground. It is at best ethically dubious. - there's no more evidence that suggests pedophiles that get to roleplay pedophila won't be pedophiles in real life as there is evidence that pedophiles who get to roleplay pedophilia decide to try it out in real life, insofar that I'm aware (it's an interesting enough subject that I'd be willing to research it sometime, though) - "As long as you're not hurting other people I'm okay with it" is generally a good rule to live by, but at the same time staff have a moral duty to ensure that people aren't actually being harmed, rather than ignore the issue entirely and assume no harm is done as long as no harm is being reported.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2019 9:30:03 GMT -5
Nevermind. reading from the phone. Was reading a wrong page.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2019 9:52:47 GMT -5
While I personally don't truly care. Keep it at 16, raise it to 18. I seriously doubt many people here care either. They just want Arm to burrrn. But is Nobokov banned in North America? There is a lot of literature about underage girls … well, having sex.
PS: Hey hey, Bitter. Glad you're still around. You should participate more. When making Qwerty account, I was looking forward to your walls of text arguments. But you're not around as much anymore.
|
|
delerak
GDB Superstar
PK'ed by jcarter
"When you want to fool the world, tell the truth." - Otto Von Bismarck
Posts: 1,670
|
Post by delerak on Sept 21, 2019 10:17:18 GMT -5
While I personally don't truly care. Keep it at 16, raise it to 18. I seriously doubt many people here care either. They just want Arm to burrrn. But is Nobokov banned in North America? There is a lot of literature about underage girls … well, having sex. PS: Hey hey, Bitter. Glad you're still around. You should participate more. When making Qwerty account, I was looking forward to your walls of text arguments. But you're not around as much anymore. I don't think any literature is banned but this is a bit different. I think the idea is you can compare Arm to say a sophisticated form of an online chat room. Chat rooms are notorious for child predators and stuff like that. It isn't out of the realm of possibility that someone could groom a child playing Arm, get their OOC details and try to find them etc. Yahoo shut down their chat rooms because of this: www.geek.com/news/yahoo-shuts-down-user-chatrooms-559227/So the concerns here aren't crazy. If Arm was ever used for something like what I mentioned, it could definitely be shut down by its web server. I will note that it being shut down wouldn't be a legal thing though, there are Terms of Service you agree to when you sign up for shit (we've all click the Accept button on a 10 page TOS), so that's what would get you shut down. AFAIK there are no actual laws that say this or that.. it would be crazy if an online game was held responsbility for kids logging into it. That would basically make every game ever unable to operate, including WoW, League of Legends etc. The game isn't responsible for the content that other people are putting on it.
|
|
jimp
staff puppet account
Posts: 10
|
Post by jimp on Sept 21, 2019 10:55:54 GMT -5
Aren't Zalanthan years and ages a little more complex than 1:1? It seems weird that wasn't discussed once in the entirety of this shitstorm.
|
|
mehtastic
GDB Superstar
Armers Anonymous sponsor
Posts: 1,699
|
Post by mehtastic on Sept 21, 2019 11:14:10 GMT -5
Well. I dont know, tbh. I dont think it's a fake account. The guy posted something a month ago. So maybe not. At the same time, he referred to the forums as GDB, which is a pretty veteran thing to do. And of course he has no details, no descriptions, again no data at all. Which I guess is possible, but seems like such a likely story. The theme of "I have no other option, but to be vocal about it" is a well used one, even though there's plenty of other actually effective options. As long as you've got something to back up your claims by. Add to it that Mehtastic was singing his "thirteen year kids rape" song yesterday and suddenly boom, a post about it 17 hours ago. We'll see. If half a year passes and it's literally the "only" post he ever makes. Then I'd think it probably is a goblin. I mean, he has no reason to hide his identity. He's not an old player trying to hide his account, he just visited it and now have left. The likelyhood of a person trying out a MUD, disliking it and then creating an account "just" to talk about it is low. Not impossible! I guess we'll see if his activity on reddit continues. Who knows. Maybe someone will ask for his account and check the run logs. And if suddenly he's like, "No no. I dont feel confident giving out this information." Then yes. I will think it's a goblin. A normal tourist player would not have that problem and 'would' be interested in identifying the weirdo pedo players. I would think. No? The post of a guy who claims he doesn't care about the issue.
|
|