Child Abuse and Statutory Rape on ArmageddonMUD

Dude I am about the furtherest thing from the cops that you will ever meet in your life, and I have zero interest in seeing anyone, even some schmuck like Nyr, go to jail. 

I didn't mention anything to the call center about my personal anecdotes man. I didn't delve into any of that shit. It wasn't a law enforcement thing that I called.

I asked questions objectively about anonymity and simulated sexual acts with minors via only a text based medium. Call the number I listed and ask questions in a similarly objective fashion, and you will be told the same damn thing.

Hmmm, yeah, well, I proved that it's illegal, when a half a dozen people were adamantly claiming it isn't, and now back to the insulting me stuff.

Maybe you're just a little pissed that you were wrong?

This fucking guy. I'm not gonna repeat it again. Armageddon has a consent bit now. If you consent, that's on you. If you don't, don't. If you -shouldn't- don't. It's not within their capabilities to check whether or not you're fourteen year old doing things you shouldn't. It is however your mother's. They can't reasonable verify your identity no more than any random site with pornography. So if you go there, it's on you. Not them. You. Should it be made harder to access for people underage? Is that what you wanna talk about? How would we do it? Really. I'm listening. How would we? Put up a little thing that you click 'yes' I'm 18 or 'no' I'm not? You think that stopped all the fourteen year olds elsewhere? NO ONE IS SAYING ITS FINE TO FUCK FOURTEEN YEAR OLDS! We have multiple times however said your little bullshit law quote wasn't the 'correct' law because it's about depicting visual graphics specifically. No one has said it's legal, still. Dude, just come off it, sit down, and go back to your pot smoking. Every time you stand up and loose your shit over here, you make the rest of us look dumb by association.

Seriously. If GDB's Allanak, and we're rinthi, you'd be shanked and made into a pie by now.

Saying that parents should be held fully responsible when their child is enticed into some shit is like saying women are asking to be raped when they wear mini skirts.

I was one of the first generation of people to have the Internet from a preteen age, and like I've said before, Armageddon is like an indecipherable wall of text to those who aren't familiar with it. It's hard for an outsider to know what's going on, period, much less being able to monitor it.

Minors can't legally consent to anything, so that's basically a moot point.

if you're about to stick your penis in a 14 year old, and they consent upon being asked, you are not in the clear, mane, and you have still broken the law. 

No, sayng that parents should be held responsible if their lack of monitoring their kid results in him writing community torture porn for years is as valid as -if not more than- saying Arm should be able to tell someone's age "because computers"

BULLSHIT. the vast majority of what you read on arm is standard english. Your parents don't have to play it to be able to read translated emots any more than they need an AOL account to read Vances AIM logs with you.